When I came to work today at 5 AM in the morning, I happily went along with preparations that I need to do before the start of my online classes. A colleague of mine then sent a link to a blog entry about a certain article written by a Chinese journalist from Hongkong. Upon reading the article, my blood boiled with such hatred and anger for such rude, disrespectful, and particularly racist comments. It’s pretty sad that such a respectable man of his profession would say such harsh and totally hurtful comments about Filipinos in general.
Filipinos generally know that we have a lot of domestic helpers abroad. In fact, the number of Filipina domestic helpers are more 300,000. This number is included in the list of the so-called unsung heroes of the Philippine economy, the OFW’s, with more than half of the Philippines’ GDP comes from the remittances of our dear unsung heroes.
Terrifying and disturbing stories of domestic helpers are told every now and then by the friends, family, and of domestic helpers themselves. It’s really sad that Filipinas go to the Middle East or East Asia just to make a living for them and their families. Stories like those of Flor Contemplacion and Sarah Balabagan rock the Philippines with reality that the country is generally in the slums.
Then comes this article that not only reiterates the already present facts but also lowers down the already undignified label of a Filipino abroad. I would agree to the claims of Mr. Chip Tsao. Yes, the Philippines is honestly just a miniscule of a nation as compared to the giant that is China. Yes, we rely heavily on countries like the United States to have security and assurance. Yes, we send more than a hundred thousand Filipinas to become slaves not only to Chinese but also Arabian masters. But, to put these claims together in context with the battle of territory for the Spratlys is truly absurd and ridiculous.
I revere the Chinese for their excellence in Math and Science. But, Mr. Chip Tsao proves that some Chinese are truly bad in English (no offense meant to the Chinese who are good English speakers). He can’t even make a logical point. Thus, he shouldn’t even write because it’s very clear that his intentions are construed. Some of the ideas he presented are totally out-of-context and baseless. Allow me to go through a couple of statements in detail.
First, the Spratlys is not in any way related to the issue of domestic help. Mr. Chip Tsao made this statement in his article:
“Manila has just claimed sovereignty over the scattered rocks in the South China…This is beyond reproach. The reason: there are more than 130,000 Filipina maids working as $3,580-a-month cheap labor in Hong Kong. As a nation of servants, you don’t flex your muscles at your master, from whom you earn most of your bread and butter.”
How on earth can we correlate the issue of territory with the economic issue of domestic help? Territorial claims fall mostly under the label of political concerns. Although territory can possibly be included in economic discussions, it is still unnecessary to bring up such sensitive and vague issue especially if it will demean anybody or any group for this matter.
Second, Mr. Tsao made this really unnerving statement addressed not only to his household help but to the Filipino people as a whole:
“I summoned Louisa, my domestic assistant who holds a degree in international politics from the University of Manila, hung a map on the wall, and gave her a harsh lecture. I sternly warned her that if she wants her wages increased next year, she had better tell every one of her compatriots in Statue Square on Sunday that the entirety of the Spratly Islands belongs to China. Grimly, I told her that if war breaks out between the Philippines and China, I would have to end her employment and send her straight home.”
And, lo and behold. Mr. Cheap, oh sorry, Chip Tsao AGAIN commits many errors here. One, Geography should never be part of domestic help training and practice. Domestic helpers, roughly about three-fourths of them, have at the very least background and knowledge of Geography. Now, Mr. Tsao, (yes, I’m talking to you) based on the map (that is if you have an accurate map), the Spratlys is not more than a hundred miles off the coast of Palawan which is incidentally part of the Western Visayas (as per the Decree of President Arroyo) making it closer of the Western Visayas (which is evidently part of the Philippine territory unless China claims it as well) making the Philippines the more rightful owner of the islands. Now, how on earth can you point out that the Spratlys rightfully belongs to China when Taiwan (an autonomous Chinese province who doesn’t even want to be part of China anymore) is closest at nearly 500 miles. The issue about the Spratlys is a sensitive issue so claims about who owns it is generally disputable. So, better not claim something your own unless proven otherwise in history, geography, or legislature Two, war is truly evitable. The United Nations will not allow such petty disputes to promote World War III. If you will read the news Mr. Tsao, the claims of the Philippines based on the new Act will still be reviewed by the United Nations. Thus, if, indeed the Spratlys belongs to your dear country, the Filipinos will be more than glad to hand it back. So, there’s really no need to flex China’s big (and sometimes bullying) muscles. Three, Mr. Tsao seems to have limited access to information. Even if Filipina maids in Hongkong be relieved of their duties as helpers (if truly war comes), there are other possibilities and opportunities for our unsung heroes. Doors are opening for Filipina maids in the Middle East, the USA, Australia, and Canada. In addition, TESDA offers Filipinas new opportunities to earn “bread and butter” so to speak through caregiving courses, computer courses, and other similar courses which are highly in demand in Europe.
Poor maid! She was put in front of a diplomatic dispute of territory in the very domestic household she works in. I wish that Mr. Tsao could see how he is totally construed and stupid. I wish to point out more errors in his article but sadly I have no more time. But, allow me to quote this one final part of Mr. Tsao’s article:
“They may have Barack Obama and the hawkish American military behind them, but we have a hostage in each of our homes in the Mid-Levels or higher.”
Scary, huh? Nope. Let me just remind some Chinese out there who seem to forget one part of World History. Pre-historical scripts show that many Chinese settle in the Philippines long before the Spanish came. Up to now, Chinese continually come to Philippine shores to find their luck and earn “bread and butter” here. It’s just rightful that I claim that the Chinese similarly are earning their “bread and butter” from us Filipinos since time immemorial. It’s not actually similar in context to domestic helpers, but still I could safely say that they are milking from the Philippine economy. If, indeed, there’s at least a single Filipina hostage in houses in Hongkong, then we have towns of Chinese hostages in the Philippines. Towns and districts like Binondo are homes of the Chinese here. Maybe, some of them are ancestors of modern Chinese. So, we have your ancestors and their families as hostages here. Take that Mr. Chip Tsao!
(Note: To fully understand the post, kindly read this article if you haven’t read the article I spoke of: http://memoirs.lecio.us/?p=364#comment-219)

Recent Comments